Biology
Home > Biology > Options > The human story > The Human Story: 1. Classification
9.8 Option - The Human Story: 1.
Classification
| Syllabus reference (October 2002
version) |
|
1.Humans have characteristics that can be used
to classify them with other organisms
|
Students learn to:
|
Students:
|
Extract from Biology Stage 6 Syllabus (Amended October
2002). © Board of Studies, NSW
Prior learning: HSC module 9.3 (subsection
5).
Science Stages 4–5 syllabus: Outcomes 4.8 (content
4.8.2 a), Outcome 5.8 (content 5.8.3 a, b).
Background: Humans are primates. Humans
therefore share many features with the other members of this
group.
outline
the general classification hierarchy from phylum to
species
- The general classification hierarchy is phylum,
class, order, family, genus and species. Within
this hierarchy, phylum is the most general category,
species is the most specific category.
define the term
species and outline
criteria used to identify a species
- A species can be defined as a group of
actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations
that is reproductively isolated from other groups.
- Because the system of classification is arbitrary and
devised by humans there are exceptions. These exceptions are
hybrids produced between species. Most hybrids are
sterile and cannot reproduce, for example, a mule can only be
produced by breeding a female horse with a male donkey.
Others are produced by unnatural close associations between
animals that would not normally occur, for example, zoo
hybrids between lions and tigers. The third exception is the
production of fertile hybrids that occurs between species,
such as the crop, Triticale, which was formed by
breeding wheat and rye.
- In general the criteria used to identify a
species is if two organisms can breed together and
form fertile offspring and they share a common gene pool,
then they are considered to be the same species.
identify data
sources, gather, process and
analyse
information from secondary sources to
illustrate the classification process by identifying
features of humans that classifies them as:
- Animal
- Chordate
- Mammal
- Primate
- Hominid
- Homo
- Homo sapiens
- Identify data sources i.e. more than
one, such as a book, an article, an encyclopaedia or an
Internet site.
- Gather a list of features of humans that
classifies them for each of the named categories. Confirm and
build your list by referring to more than one source.
- Process the information you gather by
organising your information, such as in a table as shown in
the incompleted table below, and looking for trends and
patterns.
- Analyse the information, making
generalisations
Below is a table provided as a sample of a process to
follow when addressing this dot point.
|
Classification level
|
Name of group
|
Human characteristic at this level
|
|
Kingdom
|
Animalia
|
heterotrophic, no cell wall
|
|
Phylum
|
Chordata
|
have a notochord or dorsal nerve tube
|
|
Class
|
Mammalia
|
hair, mammary glands, four chambered
heart
|
|
Order
|
Primates
|
opposable thumb, nails, binocular
vision, forward directed eyes, 2 nipples |
|
Family
|
Hominidae
|
no tail, upright stance
|
|
Genus
|
Homo
|
bipedal gait, erect posture, S-shaped
spine, foramen magnum centred under the skull |
|
Species
|
sapiens
|
large brain, complex social system,
protruding chin
|
outline
features that classify humans as:
- mammal
- primate
- hominid
- hominin
- The mammalian features of humans are: hair, mammary
glands, three separate bones in the inner ear, four-chambered
heart and a lower jaw consisting of one
bone.
- The primate features of humans include: fingernails
and toe-nails, an opposable thumb, stereoscopic (binocular)
vision, a relatively large brain, a flattened face with a
reduced sense of smell and forward facing eyes, ridged finger
pads, two nipples and a prolonged period of care for
the young.
- The hominid features of humans are: relatively large
brain size and the lack of a tail.
- The hominin features of humans are: bipedal upright
gait, arms shorter than legs, and a larger brain
size relative to body size.
discuss the
use of the terms hominin and hominid in terms of the
arbitrary nature of classification systems
- Classification systems are designed to help sort out the
millions of living organisms. They are designed for
convenience and this leads to the arbitrary or subjective
nature of classification systems. The use of the groups
hominid and hominin is undergoing change,
as new evidence becomes available from biochemical and
genetic sources. Hominids used to be a group containing
modern humans (Homo sapiens) and their close
relatives such as other members of the Homo genus (eg.
Homo neanderthalensis and Homo erectus) and
members of the genera Paranthropus and Australopithecus.
Recent evidence has shown that African apes including
bonobos, chimpanzees and gorillas are genetically very
similar to Homo sapiens and should be grouped with
them as Hominids. To distinguish the group of animals that
were once in the group hominids, the tribe grouping of
hominin is now used to distinguish the African apes from the
genera Homo, Paranthropus and
Australopithecus.
An article dealing with hominin/hominid debate:
National Geographic
Viewpoint: Is It Time to Revise the
System of Scientific Naming? Lee R. Berger, National
Geographic News, December 2001
describe
primate characteristics including:
- hand/foot structure and function, including
opposable thumb or toe
- skull shape and function
- brain size relative to body size
- arrangement of the vertebral column to the
degree of upright stance
- vision, including degree of stereoscopic
vision, colour vision
- reproductive features, including single live
young and relatively long gestation
- parenting and group bonding
Background
Primates have many characteristics but have no features
that every member possesses. As you read through the general
features of primates you will notice that you do not share
all of the features (e.g. you have an opposable thumb but you
do not have opposable toes).
The features of primates are more like a collection of
similarities including the following.
- Hand/foot structure: Primates have five
flexible digits (pentadactyl limb). The toe and thumb are
opposable. These enable objects to be grasped and
manipulated. Primates have two different types of grip called
the power grip and the precision grip. The power grip is used
to grasp objects like branches while the precision grip is
used for manipulation of fine objects and is best seen in
humans. Most primates have nails instead of claws and have
sensitive pads on the end of the fingers.
- Skull shape and function: Primates have
an enlarged skull to protect the relatively large brain. Most
primates have a flatter face with a shortened nose, this
leads to better depth perception but poorer sense of
smell.
- Brain size relative to body size:
Primates have well developed brains and when compared to
other animals of equal size have a larger relative brain size
to body size.
- Arrangement of the vertebral column:
Primates trend towards an upright stance, have an S-shaped
spine and the foramen magnum is centred under the skull.
- Vision: Primates have large forward
facing eyes. This gives a good view of overlap and
stereoscopic vision is an important feature if you are
jumping from branch to branch in a tree. Primates also have
good colour vision, once again an important adaptation to
finding fruit in trees, especially if you have a reduced
sense of smell.
- Reproductive features: Primates have a
long gestation period (length of pregnancy) and produce
usually a single baby. Most primates have a restricted
breeding period and two nipples.
- Parenting and group bonding: Primates
are dependant for a long period of time. This allows a long
learning time for the young to develop social skills that
enable group living. Living in groups is a form of protection
against predators and increases the chances of finding food.
Many primate groups are well organised with a clear hierarchy
of position.
Primates Overview
Behavioral Sciences Department, Palomar College, San Marcos, California
process
information to summarise
and analyse the
similarities and differences between prosimians, monkeys,
apes and humans
- This is best done as an excursion to the zoo where you
can examine members of the above groups. If you are unable to
visit a zoo then use the Internet sites given below to
process information.
Chimpanzee
Wikipedia. Scoll down to learn about up to date information on chimpanzee features.
Gorillas, Physical Characteristics
Busch Entertainment Corporation. Animals, SeaWorld/Busch Gardens . USA.
Orangutans: Just Hangin' On
, Nature,
PBS
describe
primate characteristics in
- prosimians
- new and old world monkeys
- apes
- humans
- Prosimians (before apes). Prosimians are
a group of lower primates including lemurs, tarsiers, lorises
and bushbabies. Their faces are often pointed and they have
grasping hands and feet. They occur in small isolated groups
and are generally endangered. They are small usually
nocturnal, arboreal (active at night, live in trees) animals
with forward facing eyes. Prosimians have a wet nose, called
a rhinarium, which is an adaptation for the sense of
smell.
Summary of prosimian features:
- small nocturnal arboreal primates
- at least one digit with a claw instead of a nail
- less opposable thumb than other primates
- grooming claw as well as nails
- more acute sense of smell than other primates
- long snout with a rhinarium
- eyes more on the side of the head than other
primates
- seasonal breeding.
Prosimians have many characteristics that differ from
other primates. The primate characteristics of this group
include:
- arboreal
- presence of nails on at least one digit
- opposable thumb but less than other primates
- forward facing eyes but less than other primates
- New and old world monkeys. Monkeys are
divided into new and old world monkeys. New world monkeys
live in the Americas and old world monkeys come from Asia and
Africa. They are usually larger than prosimians and are
diurnal (active during the day). They are generally tree
dwellers have a larger brain than prosimians and have full
binocular vision. They do not have a rhinarium. Differences
between new and old world monkeys are summarised in the table
below:
|
Feature
|
Old world monkey
|
New world monkey
|
|
prehensile tail (able to grasp objects)
|
absent
|
present
|
|
nostrils
|
pointing forward, shaped like tear drops, close
together
|
pointing sideways, nostrils round and wide apart
|
|
nose partition
|
narrow
|
wide
|
|
cheek pouches
|
present
|
absent
|
|
callosities (coloured area on the rump)
|
common
|
absent
|
Examples of New World monkeys include tamarins, squirrel
monkeys, spider monkeys, capuchins and howler monkeys.
Examples of old world monkeys include baboons, macaques,
mandrills and proboscis monkeys.
- Apes. Apes have no tails. Most are
larger than monkeys and they have a larger brain relative to
their body size. They rely on sight rather than smell and
live in organised social groups. Apes include gibbons,
orangutans, gorillas and chimpanzees.
Summary of ape features:
- forward facing eyes
- more opposable digits
- nails
- good colour and stereoscopic vision
- menstrual cycle
- no tail
- shoulders adapted for brachiation (swinging arm over
arm)
- large size.
- Humans. Humans are the only living
members of the hominin group. They are large primates with an
upright stance and bipedal locomotion. The big toe is not
opposable and the knees are locking. The pelvis of humans is
broad and barrel-shaped. The legs are longer than the arms
and the thighbone angles inwards. Human feet are flat and
humans live on the ground. The dental arch in gorillas is
U-shaped while in humans it is parabolic.
analyse
information and use available
evidence to identify
technological advances and resulting new information that
have changed scientists’ opinions about the
classification of primates
Background
Classification of the primates is difficult. The
traditional classification is based on anatomical features
while more recent classification is based on genetic
differences. The main change in classification that has
occurred is that African apes are no longer classified with
Asian apes and are considered to be much closer to humans
than Asian apes. As new technologies arise the classification
system has changed. Traditionally apes were placed in the
Pongidae family and humans were in the Hominidae. After
molecular evidence (protein analysis) was analysed it was
shown that the African apes should be in the Hominidae and
the Asian apes (gibbons and orangutan) should be in the
Pongidae. Further technological advances such as DNA-DNA
hybridisation have shown that chimpanzees and humans are
closer than gorillas. The traditional classification had
chimpanzees and gorillas closer together. The latest
development has removed the gibbons into their own family,
the Hylobatidae.
- Use available evidence on the
classification of the apes and humans as a starting point in
your study. Tarsiers also have had an interesting history of
classification changes. Tree shrews were once included in the
primate family but have now been removed.
- Analyse the information by identifying
trends, patterns and relationships as well as contradictions
in the information.
Some useful websites:
Methods of classifying
Taxonomy:
Classifying Life Dr John Kimbell, Massachusetts,
USA.
Primate taxonomy
Dr Bill Sellers, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK