Drama
Home > Drama > HSC Course > Individual Project > Design: Costume > HSC reports on Costume Design
HSC reports: costume
Over the years various observations have
been made about what constitutes a good Costume Design Project, as well as the
kind of approach that leads to a poor mark. You should check the requirements of
each project in the course prescriptions document
. A summary of those reports follows here:
The best candidates:
- presented an original, innovative concept sustained throughout the
project
- were accompanied by clear and effective support material such as written notes and swatches
- addressed all the set criteria effectively
- elected to illustrate a range of characters that reflected the scope of the text an original, innovative concept sustained throughout the total design
- renderings were executed with flair and outstanding presentation using appropriate colour, textures and material that is a visual image of the play and brings to life the personality, status and standing of each character
- an immediate and successful visual image using appropriate colour and texture
- clear and effective support material, for instance written notes and swatches
- the selection of a range of characters that reflects the scope of the text
- included a clear, concise, separate statement of the design
concept
- conceived an original, innovative but appropriate concept that was sustained throughout the total design
- accounted for various aspects of the play (genre, lighting, set) as a total concept so that the costume design did not exist in isolation from the play as a
whole
- had a visual image of the play that brought to life the personality, status and standing of each character
- selected a range of characters that reflected the scope of the
play
- executed renderings with flair and outstanding presentation, using appropriate textures and materials.

The weaker candidates:
- presented a functional or literal interpretation of the text rather than showing creative originality
- presented no design concept or one which was inappropriate
- worked in stereotypes rather than characterisations
- showed lack of understanding of the status of the characters
- often lacked skills in execution
- did not take enough care and detail in presentation
- chose less appropriate characters who offered less scope for the design concept
- imposed a time concept on the text, such as the 1960s or the future, rather than a design concept
- failed to demonstrate a knowledge of the text through an effective interpretation of the play
- submitted inadequate renderings without support material, for instance notes and swatches, which were poorly presented and explained
- failed to address the basic criteria
- failed to present the required components for instance number of renderings, number of characters
- presented only a “partial” design
- presented an inadequate response to the criteria addressed
- provided no understanding of a ‘design concept’ or the selected script
- had no detailed knowledge of character
- had poor or unacceptable execution and presentation
- demonstrated little or no knowledge of the play
- presented poorly drawn figures without any sense of character
- had little or no support material
- produced renderings which lacked any sense of individuality and often gave the appearance of fashion models rather than dramatic characters
- did not have a unified design concept for the play
- did not present the costume design in the context of the
play
- had a confused image of the character and dealt in stereotypes rather than dramatic character
- produced renderings for minor characters whose impact within the play is minimal
- had unclear or ineffective written support
- lacked a clear written design concept.
